Tag Archives: sonic ecologies

Thinking on Essay Ideas

Initially, I wanted to write on music’s place within sound art, and problematise the literature on dance music. I found that when reading Simon Reynold’s Energy Flash, there was much focus on the drugs culture of early rave music; the book was written very anecdotally, yet is taken as an academic source for documentation of early rve music and culture.

However, when reading modern readings in general, I found them to be centred around the social culture of the topics in which they speak on. I came to realise that whilst I still problemetise Reynold’s writing on UK dance music, I am now in recognition that the way in which academic writing has progressed into the twenty first century, more social and cultural observations are made, and there is less of a focus on technical research.

This means that the way modern works in art are written into history from this new more culturally focussed lens. This allows us to use these resources as research into social perspectives of issues. However, it could also begin to seperate newer art forms from older ones, disallowing them to exist in certain canons.

We can problematise this particuarly in the case of black sound art. Whilst my intial interest was to write within the topic of dance music, I came to read Teklife / Ghettoville / Eski: The Sonic Ecologies of Black Music in the Early 21st Century. Actress’s practice as a producer felt akin to the way in which sound artists create their sound. Well, Actress is litteraly using sound as his median, why isn’t he considered a sound artist? I thought about how the term “sound art” has been presented to me by educators and experiences as a very broad term, with sound art being able to be considered visual art in many cases. If sound art is a fluid art form, how can we explain its undeniable exclusions of certain artists from its canon? I beleive that the fundamental reasoning for this is the way that soubnd art, and art in general, have become academic practices; the study of them in order to validate oneself as an artist, the mass inaccessibility of historical readings or knowledge on practices.

When choosing to study sound art, I wasn’t sure what it even was- to be honest I’m still not sure what it actually even is. We had Jose telling us in first year that music was NOT to be created within the course, an overall feeling of dislike for structured music from the educators on the course. I thought about Actress speaking on his own music in Sonic Ecologies: “I wanna hear form, I wanna hear structure”. I thought about how I, too, want to hear form and structure. There is something about rhythm that feels like I inhabit it within my body, where music without a clear sense of direction or groove, I feel detached from. Does this mean I’m not a sound artist? Maybe. But I would like to propose the idea of sound art as litteraly any art situated around sound. And would like to further propose the idea that exclusions of partciular artists from its canon is due to sound art’s position within academia.

When chossing to study sound art, I looked to Berlin based artist Klein, from South London. I percieve her art as sound art. Maybe it is not, but then we must unpack why. I don’t have a statistic or anything to prove it, but I know that there is a clear exclusion of black artists from the sound art realm. I see artists who created very musical works, such as Harold Budd or even Brian Eno becoming main proponents on the topic, yet Actress’s avante garde experimintalism with field recordings, isn’t even considered sound art. Isn’t what he does quite litteraly the definition of ecological sound art? I believe that the barriers put in place in what is and isn’t considered sound art are institutional barriers; with instituitional racism being the root of the black exclusion. Therefore, I have decided to us ethe opportunity of writing this essay to speak on the reasons for exclsuion and highlight the issue.

Sonic Ecologies

The field of ecology is one of nature and ecosystems. It is a field of interconnectedness, sensitivity and presence. It is a lense that anything in existence can be analysed through. Ecology is simply the analysis of the relationships of any given thing to the environment in which it lives or exists in.

Jonathan Gillmurray looks into “ecological sound art” as a field of study. He makes the claim that environmentalism in sound art isn’t as recognised as it is in other art forms, and wants to make a case for ecological sound art to stand as its own distinct field outside of other ecological art practices and saound art istelf. He thinks of ecological sound art as specifically concerned with environmental issues. Whilst there is a “clear innaction” against the worsening environmental issues the earth faces, Bill McKibben noted back in 2005 that art and religion are mediums that humans truky digest, so to talk about issues and implement change, they must be adressed through these mediums, particuarly art.

So if ecological sound art specifically regards the state of our natural environment, then it must use these environments within the art. Perhaps this is why environmentalist art is often referred to as “land art”, as it is quite litteraly art made from the land. Gillmurray points to a growth in texts surrounding environmental discourse leading to a growth in the art based around these issues. The symbiosis of environmental academia and art can be seen in the field of ecomusicology, which concerns music, culture and nature. Gillmurray notes than sound art is not recognised within the field of ecomusicology. But why can’t it be? Gillmurray suggests that perhaps the term “music” within ecomusicoloy is too narrowing. But isn’t music a part of sound art, and would that not therefore mean that sound art could be one lense to anaylse culture and nature within ecomusicology? It feels as though sound art wants its own seperate validation and pushes itself out of broader art fields, rather than those art fields pushing away sound art. Because at the end of the day, what even is sound art? If we prescribe certain attributes to the meaning of sound art such as “art that contains sounds but cannot be too musical” or “art that contains visuals but cannot be too focussed on the visual”, it gives sound art a sense of elitism and pushes away artists from considering their art as part of this field. These attributes are essentially what Gillmurray is prescribing to sound art when he claims that it is not “musical enough” nor “visual enough” to be included within ecomusicology.

Perhaps the entire argument Gillmurray presents here in this article is based on personal feeling about what sound art means to him. Personally, reading his article affirmed to me how much a part of ecomusicology sound art is, and how interwined sound art is with every realm of the art world.

Being in El Salvador, a country built on volcanic land, preserving many of its indigineous traditions, I have been inspired to create what I would consider to be ecological sound art. Using field recordings taken (so far) from the top of the volcano using both the stero recorder and a contact microphone, I have begun creating music that will be scored to the visuals for my second Happiness Starts with Dancing film, Happiness Starts with Home. It is important for me to be able to construct the sounds made using sounds from the land, meaning I am quite litteraly making “land art”. The sounds I am creating are quite musical- they are inspired by the musical soundscape of El Salvador (Cumbia, Merengue), but perhaps according to Gillmurray, this would therefore make my art not be sound art, as it is too musical. Perhaps in that sense then, according to Gillmurray, I am not a sound artist, as I do not want to create sounds that leave the listener in a state of anxiety or clulessness. I want my sounds to provide a sense of safety and familiarity- a sense of home.